Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Nature volume 609, pages 695–700 (2022 )Cite this article
Electrostriction is a property of dielectric materials whereby an applied electric field induces a mechanical deformation proportional to the square of that field. The magnitude of the effect is usually minuscule (<10–19 m2 V–2 for simple oxides). However, symmetry-breaking phenomena at the interfaces can offer an efficient strategy for the design of new properties1,2. Here we report an engineered electrostrictive effect via the epitaxial deposition of alternating layers of Gd2O3-doped CeO2 and Er2O3-stabilized δ-Bi2O3 with atomically controlled interfaces on NdGaO3 substrates. The value of the electrostriction coefficient achieved is 2.38 × 10–14 m2 V–2, exceeding the best known relaxor ferroelectrics by three orders of magnitude. Our theoretical calculations indicate that this greatly enhanced electrostriction arises from coherent strain imparted by interfacial lattice discontinuity. These artificial heterostructures open a new avenue for the design and manipulation of electrostrictive materials and devices for nano/micro actuation and cutting-edge sensors.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Get full journal access for 1 year
All prices are NET prices. VAT will be added later in the checkout. Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
The code used for the creation of the physical and atomic-scale models is available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Ramesh, R. & Schlom, D. G. Creating emergent phenomena in oxide superlattices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 257–268 (2019).
Yang, M. M. et al. Piezoelectric and pyroelectric effects induced by the interface polar symmetry. Nature 584, 377–381 (2020).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Li, F., Jin, L., Xu, Z. & Zhang, S. Electrostrictive effect in ferroelectrics: an alternative approach to improve piezoelectricity. Appl. Phys. Rev. 1, 011103 (2014).
Lehmann, W. et al. Giant lateral electrostriction in ferroelectric liquid-crystalline elastomers. Nature 410, 447–450 (2001).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Yimnirun, R., Moses, P. J., Newnham, R. E. & Meyer Jr, R. J. Electrostrictive strain in low-permittivity dielectrics. J. Electroceram. 8, 87–98 (2002).
Li, F., Jin, L., Xu, Z., Wang, D. & Zhang, S. Electrostrictive effect in Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-xPbTiO3 crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 152910 (2013).
Zednik, R. J., Varatharajan, A., Oliver, M., Valanoor, N. & McIntyre, P. C. Mobile ferroelastic domain walls in nanocrystalline PZT films: the direct piezoelectric effect. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3104–3110 (2011).
Li, F. et al. Ultra-high piezoelectricity in ferroelectric ceramics by design. Nat. Mater. 17, 349–354 (2018).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. M., Bharti, V. & Zhao, X. Giant electrostriction and relaxor ferroelectric behaviour in electron-irradiated poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene) copolymer. Science 280, 2101–2104 (1998).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Korobko, R. et al. Giant electrostriction in Gd-doped ceria. Adv. Mater. 24, 5857–5861 (2012).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Yavo, N. et al. Large nonclassical electrostriction in (Y, Nb)-stabilised δ-Bi2O3. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 1138–1142 (2016).
Korobko, R. et al. In situ extended X-ray absorption fine structure study of electrostriction in Gd-doped ceria. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 042904 (2015).
Hadad, M., Ashraf, H., Mohanty, G., Sandu, C. & Muralt, P. Key-features in processing and microstructure for achieving giant electrostriction in gadolinium-doped ceria thin films. Acta Mater. 118, 1–7 (2016).
ADS CAS Article Google Scholar
Santucci, S., Zhang, H., Sanna, S., Pryds, N. & Esposito, V. Enhanced electromechanical coupling of TiN/Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 thin film electrostrictor. APL Mater. 7, 071104 (2019).
Sata, N., Eberman, K., Eberl, K. & Maier, J. Mesoscopic fast ion conduction in nanometer-scale planar heterostructures. Nature 408, 946–949 (2000).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Domínguez, C. et al. Length scales of interfacial coupling between metal and insulator phases in oxides. Nat. Mater. 19, 1182–1187 (2020).
ADS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Haeni, J. H. et al. Room-temperature ferroelectricity in strained SrTiO3. Nature 430, 758–761 (2004).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Cancellieri, C. et al. Electrostriction at LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 056102 (2011).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Junquera, J. & Ghosez, P. Critical thickness for ferroelectricity in perovskite ultrathin films. Nature 422, 506–509 (2003).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Fong, D. D. et al. Ferroelectricity in ultrathin perovskite films. Science 304, 1650–1653 (2004).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Mani, B. K., Chang, C. M., Lisenkov, S. & Ponomareva, I. Critical thickness for antiferroelectricity in PbZrO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 097601 (2015).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Zhang, W. & Ouyang, J. In Nanostructures In Ferroelectric Films For Energy Applications(ed. Ouyang, J.) 163–201 (Elsevier, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813856-4.00006-5
Ji, D. et al. Freestanding crystalline oxide perovskites down to monolayer limit. Nature 570, 87–90 (2019).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Sanna, S. et al. Enhancement of chemical stability in confined δ-Bi2O3. Nat. Mater. 14, 500–504 (2015).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Sanna, S. et al. Structural instability and electrical properties of epitaxial Er2O3-stabilized Bi2O3 thin films. Solid State Ion. 266, 13–18 (2014).
ADS CAS Article Google Scholar
Varenik, M. et al. Dopant concentration controls the quasi-static electrostrictive strain response of ceria ceramics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 39381–39387 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
Li, Q. et al. Giant thermally enhanced electrostriction and polar surface phases in La2Mo2O9 oxygen ion conductors. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 041403(R) (2018).
Chen, B. et al. Large electrostrictive responses in lead halide perovskites. Nat. Mater. 17, 1020–1026 (2018).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Das, T. et al. Anisotropic chemical strain in cubic ceria due to oxygen-vacancy-induced elastic dipoles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 15293–15299 (2018).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Kraynis, O. et al. Modeling strain distribution at the atomic level in doped ceria films with extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy. Inorg. Chem. 58, 7527–7536 (2019).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Born, M. & Mayer, J. E. Zur gittertheorie der ionenkristalle. Z. Phys. 75, 1–18 (1932).
Chapman, J. B. J., Cohen, R. E., Kimmel, A. V. & Duffy, M. D. Improving the functional control of aged ferroelectrics using insights from atomistic modeling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 177602 (2017).
ADS CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
Liu, S. & Cohen, R. E. Response of methylammonium lead iodide to external stimuli and caloric effects from molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 17274–17281 (2016).
Genreith-Schriever, A. & De Souza, R. A. Field-enhanced ion transport in solids: reexamination with molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. B 94, 224304 (2016).
Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).
Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985).
ADS CAS Article Google Scholar
Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).
ADS CAS MATH Article Google Scholar
This research was supported by the BioWings project, funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020, Future and Emerging Technologies programme (grant no. 801267), and by the Danish Council for Independent Research Technology and Production Sciences for the DFF—Research Project 2 (grant no. 48293). N.P. and D.V.C. acknowledge funding from Villum Fonden for the NEED project (no. 00027993) and from the Danish Council for Independent Research Technology and Production Sciences for the DFF—Research Project 3 (grant no. 00069 B). V.E. acknowledges funding from Villum Fonden for the IRIDE project (no. 00022862). N.G. and J.V. acknowledge funding from the GOA project ('Solarpaint') of the University of Antwerp. The microscope used in this work was partly funded by the Hercules Fund from the Flemish Government. D.J. acknowledges funding from the FWO Project (no. G093417N) from the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research. D.C. acknowledges TOP/BOF funding from the University of Antwerp. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research Infrastructure—Integrating Activities for Advanced Communities—under grant agreement no. 823717-ESTEEM3. We thank T. D. Pomar and A. J. Bergne for English proofreading.
These authors contributed equally: Haiwu Zhang, Nini Pryds
Department of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Haiwu Zhang, Nini Pryds, Simone Santucci, Dennis V. Christensen, Andrea R. Insinga, Ivano E. Castelli & Vincenzo Esposito
Group for Ferroelectrics and Functional Oxides, Institute of Materials, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology-EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Dae-Sung Park & Dragan Damjanovic
Electron Microscopy for Materials Science, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
Nicolas Gauquelin, Daen Jannis, Dmitry Chezganov & Johan Verbeeck
Institut für Physik, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Institute of Materials, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne - EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
H.Z., N.P. and V.E. conceived the idea and designed the project. H.Z. and S.S. prepared samples and characterized their electromechanical properties. N.G. performed STEM measurements and analysed STEM–EELS results. D.J. assisted with processing of HAADF–STEM data analysis. D.C. performed statistical analysis of the EDX results under the supervision of N.G. and J.V. D.-S.P., P.M., D.D. and D.A.R. performed XRD and RSM characterization. H.Z., I.L. and I.E.C. performed atomic-scale simulations and analysis. D.V.C. performed finite-element simulations. A.R.I., I.L. and P.M. developed the analytical model. H.Z., V.E. and N.P. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Correspondence to Haiwu Zhang, Nini Pryds or Vincenzo Esposito.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
a. HAADF-STEM images for NGO/CGO[ESB/CGO]10 viewed along the [110] and [001] directions of the substrate from left to right, respectively. b. STEM-EELS compositional maps. For each sample, the leftmost image is the HAADF signal acquired simultaneously with the EELS measurement, followed by cerium M4,5 in red, erbium M4,5 in yellow, and neodymium M4,5 in green (colour code: Ce: red; Er: yellow, Nd: green). c. STEM-EDX compositional maps.
a. Electrostrictive response of NGO/CGO/[ESB/CGO]7 under an alternating electric field. The strain developed at the second harmonic of the applied electric field. b. Field-induced stress as a function of the electrical field for NGO/CGO/[ESB/CGO]N measured at 1 Hz. The field-induced stress increases linearly with an increase in the squared electric field. No saturation was observed within the measured electric field range, regardless of the modulation length. The dash-dotted lines represent linear fittings of the measured results.
Comparison of electrostriction coefficients for thick CGO films and bulk materials Multilayer* denotes NGO(100)/ESB/CGO/…/CGO, where ESB was deposited as the first layer.
Electromechanical response of NGO/CGO/[ESB/CGO]7 as a function of time. a. Electric field. b. Electromechanical stress in response to an electric field at 1 Hz c. Electromechanical stress as a function of the measured cycles at 1, 50, and 200 Hz. All measurements were performed by applying a sinusoidal electric field with a constant amplitude of 17.4 kV/cm.
a. CGO20; b. ESB20; c. heterostructure (Λ = 2.33 nm). An electrical field was applied along the (100)-crystallographic direction. All lattice parameters were allowed to relax during the application of the electrical field. εxx, εxy, and εxz denote the strain developed along the X-, Y-, and Z-axis, respectively when the electric field is applied along with the X-axis. The Cartesian axes X, Y, and Z correspond to the (100), (01-1) and (011) crystallographic directions, respectively. Note that the lattices of CGO20, ESB20, and the heterostructure exhibit similar deformation in response to an electric field, that is, contract along the (100)-crystallographic direction and expand along with the (011) and (01-1)-crystallographic directions.
a. fluorite: CGO20/YSZ8; b. perovskite: SFTO10/BYZO10; c. garnet: GGMO10/LSFO10; d. spinel: MGMO10/ZAZO10. The chemical formula for YSZ8, SFTO10, BYZO10, GGMO10, LSFO10, MGMO10 and ZAZO10 are \(({{\rm{Zr}}}_{0.92}^{4+}{{\rm{Y}}}_{0.08}^{3+}{){\rm{O}}}_{1.96}^{2-}\) , \({{\rm{Sr}}}_{1.0}^{2+}{({\rm{Fe}}}_{0.1}^{3+}{{{\rm{Ti}}}_{0.9}^{4+}){\rm{O}}}_{2.95}^{2-}\) , \({{\rm{Ba}}}_{1.0}^{2+}{({\rm{Y}}}_{0.1}^{3+}{{{\rm{Zr}}}_{0.9}^{4+}){\rm{O}}}_{2.95}^{2-}\) , \({{\rm{Gd}}}_{3.0}^{3+}({{\rm{Ga}}}_{4.5}^{3+}{{{\rm{Mg}}}_{0.5}^{2+}){\rm{O}}}_{11.75}^{2-}\) , \({({\rm{La}}}_{2.5}^{3+}{{\rm{Sr}}}_{0.5}^{2+}){{{\rm{Fe}}}_{5.0}^{3+}{\rm{O}}}_{11.75}^{2-}\) , \({{\rm{Mg}}}_{1.0}^{2+}({{\rm{Ga}}}_{1.8}^{3+}{{{\rm{Mg}}}_{0.2}^{2+}){\rm{O}}}_{3.90}^{2-}\) , \({{\rm{Zn}}}_{1.0}^{2+}({{\rm{Al}}}_{1.8}^{3+}{{{\rm{Zn}}}_{0.2}^{2+}){\rm{O}}}_{3.90}^{2-}\) , respectively. The defects are generated at random within the heterostructures. The insets schematically show the unit cell of the ideal structure. All the lattice parameters are allowed to relax during the application of the electrical field. Note that the optimal modulation length yielding maximized electrostriction coefficient (Mxx) is material dependent.
Radial distribution function of heterostructures as a function of modulation length (Λ). The first, second, and third peaks correspond to the cation–anion, anion–anion, and cation–cation distances, respectively. No electric field was applied.
a. An ideal tetrahedron with cations having equivalent distances and three C2 symmetry axes present. Schematic illustration of the elastic dipole formation resulting from tetrahedral deformation along the b. (100), c. (010), and d. (001) directions. The off-site displacements of the cations result in local-symmetry breaking. Note that replacing one of the ions with Gd will result in a structure with three variants that are equivalent to the distortion of Ceria without Gd.
Supplementary Sections 1–6, including Supplementary Figs. 1–6 and Supplementary References.
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Zhang, H., Pryds, N., Park, DS. et al. Atomically engineered interfaces yield extraordinary electrostriction. Nature 609, 695–700 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05073-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05073-6
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
Nature (Nature) ISSN 1476-4687 (online) ISSN 0028-0836 (print)
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.